Oz (James Franco) finds himself in a magical world needing saved from the Wicked Witch. |
No offense to Sam Raimi, but he's probably not one of the
first directors that comes to mind who would attempt to reimagine the enchanting
world of L. Frank Baum's Oz. Given his directorial track record of the Spider-Man trilogy, Army of Darkness and The Evil
Dead, a land of munchkins, witches and wizards seems all too foreign for someone
who made his mark producing cult-classic splatter-fests.
Oz the Great and
Powerful reopens the doors to the whimsical parallel world made famous by
Baum's series of novels and Victor Fleming's 1939 classic starring Judy
Garland. But this trip misses a few of the key ingredients. No Dorothy. No
Scarecrow. No Tin Man. No Cowardly Lion. In fact, the Wizard of Oz comes in the
form of James Franco as a small-time magician from Kansas, continuously looking
for opportunities to cheat and swindle the simple-minded.
Working as a prequel to the 1939 classic, Raimi unravels the
back story behind classic characters such as Oz, Glinda and the Wicked Witches
in order to bridge the two films. Oz substitutes Dorothy as the protagonist,
swept away by a tornado to the land of Oz. Instead of a Scarecrow, a Tin Man
and Cowardly Lion as sidekicks, Oz is assisted in his travels by a flying
monkey (Zach Braff), a delicate china doll (Joey King) and Glinda the Good
Witch (Michelle Williams).
Oz is nowhere near
the classic that the Judy Garland film is, nor does it have to be. All Oz is expected to do is offer up a
modern-day iteration that hearkens back to the days when going to the movies was
a lighthearted diversion. Raimi accomplishes that with ease, thanks to the
laundry list of references and a story that works wonders.
Once Raimi throws in a derivative prophecy and matches The Wizard of Oz move for move in its
storytelling, it's clear that there's enough of a spark to engage the interest
of audience who have witnessed this type of archetypal tale time and time
again.
But as much as Oz is
an homage to the original film, Raimi does put his own spin on the timeless
world. The lands of Oz are more expansive this time around due to advances in
film technology and that itself is a double-edged sword. Many times, Oz emerges
in a tangible form, particularly when scenes are shot on actual sets. But at
the same time, much of the green screen work lacks depth and reality,
disrupting the illusion that the world of Oz goes beyond the sterile sets. The
overuse and lack of integrating green screen with actual sets is reminiscent of
Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland from
2010.
That ultimately leaves the CG effects as hit-or-miss, but
the real home run is breathing life into Oz's china doll companion, who steals
every scene she's in and melts hearts left and right. With that being said, Joey
King certainly gives the finest performance in Oz the Great and Powerful even outshining her adult co-stars.
James Franco works as the titular Oz and it'll be
interesting to see if he's able to carry Disney's brand new cash cow. Painted
with shades of gray characterizations, Franco's Oz is entertaining to watch, either
sharply pulling towards love or hate depending on his complicated nature.
Rachel Weisz and Mila Kunis play Emerald City's regent sisters, Evanora and
Theodora, and the two certainly ham it up for Oz's lengthy 130 minute run-time. Despite some clunky chemistry,
their presence onscreen is nothing more than passable with Weisz being the
better of the two. Rounding out of the cast, Michelle Williams has very little
to do as gaudy jeweled Glinda, whose talents are better suited for more adult
films.
What keeps Oz the
Great and Powerful from what its title actually suggests is its bloated run
time, which even from the first scenes in Kansas foreshadows Raimi taking his
good old time to tell such a simplistic story. Oz has no need to cross into overindulgent Peter Jackson territory.
Here, just getting straight to the point is precisely what this film needs to
go from good to great.
Oz the Great and
Powerful is the most heartwarming surprise of the year that even with a few
cracks in the Yellow Brick Road has finally given Disney their first tentpole
franchise since Pirates.
GRADE: B (8/10)
I, myself is a huge fan of the original 1939 movie. This new updated version I would have to see and compare. My question is: Where in the hell so Toto?
ReplyDelete